Post by account_disabled on Jan 23, 2024 10:15:53 GMT
Users will have a safer option. Staggered age adjustments One of the main causes of lawsuits against health plans is related to age adjustments. Currently, the last age group foreseen in contracts is 59 years old. The problem is that upon reaching this age, users undergo adjustments that reach percentages of 80%, 90% and even 100%. The reform of the legislation proposes changes in this regard, providing that: "To apply the adjustment for the last age group, the operator, when the beneficiary turns 59, will calculate the nominal value of the adjustment by dividing it into five installments, of a maximum of 20 % each, which will be applied every five years".
In other words, if upon Buy Phone Number List reaching 59 years of age the user would have an adjustment provided for in the contract of, for example, 100%, with the new system annual adjustments of 20% would be applied over the following 5 years. In other words, the user would have an increase of 20% at age 59, 20% at age 64, 20% at age 69, 20% at age 74 and 20% at age 79. In practice, the proposal creates new age groups (which would be prohibited by the Elderly Statute), but dilutes the impact of the adjustment over time.
This will certainly be a point in the project that is still subject to much discussion. Encouraging the provision of technical information to judges The text of the project proposes that "(…) in demands in which the performance of a health procedure or the supply of a health product or medicine is requested, the judge must, before granting the protection of urgently, request the opinion of a health professional, member of a technical support center provided by the court or an associated entity". This provision in the proposal is not new.
In other words, if upon Buy Phone Number List reaching 59 years of age the user would have an adjustment provided for in the contract of, for example, 100%, with the new system annual adjustments of 20% would be applied over the following 5 years. In other words, the user would have an increase of 20% at age 59, 20% at age 64, 20% at age 69, 20% at age 74 and 20% at age 79. In practice, the proposal creates new age groups (which would be prohibited by the Elderly Statute), but dilutes the impact of the adjustment over time.
This will certainly be a point in the project that is still subject to much discussion. Encouraging the provision of technical information to judges The text of the project proposes that "(…) in demands in which the performance of a health procedure or the supply of a health product or medicine is requested, the judge must, before granting the protection of urgently, request the opinion of a health professional, member of a technical support center provided by the court or an associated entity". This provision in the proposal is not new.